callistahogan: (Default)
Last year, one of my extracurricular activities involved being part of a small, three to four person book club. Run by our local Youthlinks, the club centered primarily on reading banned books. On the first day of the club, we received a list of all banned books, which included such classics like The Catcher in the Rye and Lolita. We were each instructed to pick five of the books we wanted to read during the six week period, and then we would decide on the two or three we would actually be reading.

Our first book was The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Heather* and I had both wanted to read that book for quite a while, but neither of us had gotten around to it, so it was exciting for us. We got to read a book that we had heard so much about. We knew about the controversy surrounding it, how the Californians had wanted to ban the book because they felt it portrayed the people of that time in an unsavory light. We knew about the Dust Bowl, the Okies, and how they had struggled each and every day for a way to survive. We knew the Okies were a fleeing people, and we knew the Californians were just ready to catch them and beat them down once again. I thought maybe it would have been better if they had stayed in Kansas or Texas or Oklahoma, because at least then they wouldn't get their hopes up about the chance for a better life.

So we started reading it. It was slow going at first -- I couldn't get used to the dialect, and I got distracted by the ragged copy of the book I had received -- but once I got into it, I really got into it. I got caught up in the story of the Joads and their struggle to survive. I felt their pain, empathized with their struggle, and found myself enjoying the book. Although there was one thing I could not understand.

Why in the world was the book banned?

Sure, it did not portray the residents of California in the most savory light, but why would it? Everyone alive during that time knew what was going on. There are numerous historical accounts, both written and spoken, that express the same thing that The Grapes of Wrath does. After the book came out, there was an overwhelming agreement with what Steinbeck spoke. The ending scene of the book was also questionable, but it was by no means graphic. Nothing in the book was graphic. Instead, it seemed like an honest portrayal of the time back then. It was full of heart, with a good Christian message.

So why in the world was it banned?

Because a group of people claimed that it bore false witness. They claimed that it did not speak the truth as it was, and instead demonized a particular group of people -- when we know now that their belief is anything but true.

My view is that it is not the book that bears false witness, but rather it is the people trying to ban it that bear false witness. The Grapes of Wrath expressed the struggle that the Okies felt and expressed it in an honest way that did not attempt to sugarcoat the truth. It exposed the world as it really was back then, and I'm positive it was even worse for other families.

This goes for all other banned books.

We recently read The Catcher in the Rye in school. While I could see people banning this book for its language and content (specifically the scene in which Holden hires that prostitute), a good message is present. It exposes the phoniness of the world today, shows how people try so hard to fit in with society, to grow up and be an adult. It tells us that people are different, and that by having a different face for everyone we come across, we are being hypocrites. Holden bemoans the phoniness in his life, but he is phony himself. The book exposes the hypocrisy and the phoniness in today's society -- but people cannot see that because they do not look beyond the swears.

As a writer, I go to books to escape to a different world and uncover some truth that I might not have known about. I go to books to see the world as it really is, without the rose-colored glasses that I so often wear. I go to discover a section of culture that I did not know about before. I go to learn about life.

But I ask: How can I learn about life -- how can anyone learn about life -- if there are books we cannot read?

I strongly believe that each banned book has something we need to know, something that we need to understand. Take Lolita as a prime example. It is a heinous book, full of terrible viewpoints and a truly villainous main character, but do people really believe that there are not people like that in today's society? Because I know there are, and by banning the book, it is like sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "lalalalala" whenever something bad happens.

So often, life is sugarcoated. People like to think that nothing bad ever happens, so they can exist in their own little bubble. But bad things do happen, and saying anything contrary to that is bearing false witness and omitting details people don't enjoy thinking about. By not allowing teenagers especially to learn about life as it truly is, how do they expect us to grow up to be upstanding members of society? If we do not learn now about what life is like, then we can't expect to know what to do when we get thrust into the world at large, where people do starve, people are pedophiles, people are phony assholes.

Books are often a window into the souls of the unsavory, a portal to the dark things we do not want to know or think about.

But if we do not think of them, we exist in a bubble.

And eventually that bubble will be popped, you know, so better sooner than later, in the comfort of your own home.

*Name changed for protection purposes.

--

This is my entry for week 5 of [livejournal.com profile] therealljidol. Thanks go to Writer's Block for giving me inspiration for this topic; otherwise, mine would be quite cliched!

Date: 2009-11-18 09:23 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] stormkitty.livejournal.com
Excellent entry. I tried to read Catcher in the Rye but just could not get into it. I do want to read Grapes of Wrath now.

Date: 2009-11-18 09:56 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] zia-narratora.livejournal.com
I think the problem with the Grapes of Wrath was how it portrayed turtles crossing the road in an unsavory light. Poor turtles.

Date: 2009-11-19 12:02 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] rattsu.livejournal.com
THIS!

I cannot honestly understand how you can ban a book. I was seeing LJ's writing block prompt today, and my initial reaction was HELL NONE.

You have out my feelings into far more eloquent words, and the very thought of a bookclub reading exclusively banned books is nothing short of awesome. My hat is off to you, this was by far my favorite entry of yours so far!

Date: 2009-11-21 01:01 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] oneonthefence.livejournal.com
I am being very lazy by not leaving my own comment, but instead tacking one on here saying that I, word for word, agree with [livejournal.com profile] rattsu. That LJ prompt pissed me off, by the way, and this entry? My favorite of yours so far as well.

Date: 2009-11-21 03:46 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] mstrobel.livejournal.com
What was the prompt? I raced to the homepage but it's a new one by now!

Date: 2009-11-21 07:38 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] oneonthefence.livejournal.com
It was there about two days ago, so if you look back in the archives, you'll see it. It was about banning books for high-schoolers.

Date: 2009-11-22 12:53 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] mstrobel.livejournal.com
Thank you. I never knew there were archives ... and now I see the link to them was right there, staring at me!

Date: 2009-11-19 02:52 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] comedychick.livejournal.com
I haven't read any of the books you mentioned, but I liked your take on the topic! It seemed very well thought out and I found it a strong case for your argument. Well done!

Date: 2009-11-19 07:36 pm (UTC)From: [personal profile] shadowwolf13
shadowwolf13: (Default)
Thus why we don't ban books in our home. There are some I'd rather Miss Kid not read until she's older but that's about it. :)

Date: 2009-11-20 05:04 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] sherriola.livejournal.com
Great entry. i completely agree with you about banned books and about letting teenagers learn truth so they can grow up prepared and maybe even to try to change some of the not so good stuff. I really enjoyed this.

Date: 2009-11-21 03:45 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] mstrobel.livejournal.com
I was looking at a list of banned books recently and most of them had me wondering, why on earth was that banned? Such petty reasons for most of them! And for the others ... well, still petty. "And by banning the book, it is like sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "lalalalala" whenever something bad happens." <-- perfect summation. If someone has a problem with a book they can just not read it, but should still let others make their own choice.

Date: 2009-11-21 11:29 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] onda-bianca.livejournal.com
The idea of banning a book is just so ridiculous to me...it's hard to fathom really. Great entry!

Date: 2009-11-22 03:39 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] jenandbronze.livejournal.com
I wrote these titles down, as just this past week, I am planning in the new year to broaden my world of reading. I am a book worm, and usually read mainly mysteries, but in the last month totally started to read a book ouit of my comfort zone and finding it an easy read, but an interesting read, "My Sister's Keeper". Mom is going to lend me "Kite Runner" when school finishes. I see you have a ton of book suggestions on the left side... I have always grown up loving to read, and need to try some new authors for a change.

Very, very interesting handle on the topic!

Date: 2009-11-22 07:34 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] so-small.livejournal.com
I agree completely with you, especially with your last line.

Date: 2009-11-22 10:54 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] markmade.livejournal.com
Excellent entry. You have my vote!

Date: 2009-11-23 01:41 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] java-fiend.livejournal.com
Very, very, very well said.

Date: 2009-11-23 02:18 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] rejeneration.livejournal.com
Mmmm, Catcher in the Rye. I love me some good Steinbeck. =)

Date: 2009-11-23 04:27 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_mysticalelf/
I totally enjoyed reading your entry this week.

Date: 2009-11-23 05:55 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] roina-arwen.livejournal.com
Very good points, and well thought out! Free the Books!!

Date: 2009-11-25 12:20 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] theafaye.livejournal.com
I couldn't get through Grapes of Wrath and completely disagree that Lolita is heinous - it's one of my favourite books of all time and one of the best written!

Just goes to show that any attempt at trying to impose objective standards as to what's acceptable or good is doomed to failure. As Doreen Valiente once said, "publish and be damned!"

Date: 2009-11-25 02:23 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] callistahogan.livejournal.com
Oh, no, I didn't mean Lolita was heinous as in badly written. I only meant that the storyline was heinous, and the idea that there are people like that out there. I too think that the book was beautifully written. :)

Date: 2009-11-25 04:43 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] poppetawoppet.livejournal.com
Because I know there are, and by banning the book, it is like sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "lalalalala" whenever something bad happens.

hahaha this line!

banning books just makes my blood boil.

Grapes of Wrath was the only good thing about summmer reading in the tenth grade for me...

Date: 2009-11-25 06:07 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] twistersflower.livejournal.com
Fabulous post!!! What a writer you are!

Profile

callistahogan: (Default)
callistahogan

March 2010

S M T W T F S
 12 345 6
78 910111213
1415 1617 1819 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2017 06:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios