MILESTONE.

[callistahogan]

I REACHED 30K!

I seriously didn't think I would reach it today, but I did. This is partly due to my ingenious strategy of figuring out how many pages makes up approximately a thousand words (in OO, it's between two and three pages, by the way), and then not letting myself stop writing until I've filled that amount of pages. Or, you know, until I finish one page.

This is helpful because, instead of waiting to take a break after a thousand words, I wait to take a break until after a page is done. Then, while I'm taking my break, I can calculate about how many pages I need to fill before I have written a thousand words.

Rinse, repeat.

This strategy is working quite well. I hope to use it tomorrow and who knows? I wrote four thousand words in about four hours (would have taken me less than that, probably, had I not gotten sidetracked by Dancing With the Stars), so I might be able to double that tomorrow.

I hope so.

--

In other news:

This morning in English class, we were discussing Elie Wiesel's Night and somehow it turned into some sort of whole theological debate, about whether God can be paralleled to Hitler or not, whether Moishe the Beadle's words to Eliezer were saying "You are God" or something else, and all of that incredibly dense stuff that people spend lifetimes studying.

I found it interesting, but after the Hitler comment, I spoke up, and I think I made a lot of sense. Of course, I could be wrong, but I just had to say something. There are so many differences between Hitler and God, definitely, and I could write a whole post on that sometime. Oh, and a whole post on a parallel I saw, about how Voldemort pretty much parallels Hitler in ways. I might write that.

Hmm.

*goes off to think*

Comments

[callistahogan.livejournal.com]

No, it doesn't really. I just don't want to say anything for fear I'll botch the whole thing up, not because I believe God was somehow unjust. This is simply a difficult topic to answer. People spend their entire lives studying this, and yet they may never come to an adequate conclusion. Theologians don't even have all the answers. I'm 14. I can't have them either. If you'd like, I'll look this up in more detail and then get back to you. There's also lots of information on this topic online as well. I can point you to some links within a couple days (if I'm not too busy writing).

However, I do not believe there are discrepancies or issues between my belief that God was just during the Flood and my belief in the sanctity of life.

[wheatear.livejournal.com]

Yes, it is difficult. Theologians are more sophisticated at it, but you still get endless contortions in the attempts to justify the unjustifiable.

Thanks for offering, and you can point me to some links if you like, although it probably won't be anything new...

You believe that it was just for God to take away the lives of infants who, let's face it, did nothing to deserve that. You also believe in the sanctity of life. Do you honestly not see any tension there? If life is so precious, why is it okay for God to treat it in such a cavalier fashion?