(no subject)
May. 10th, 2008 04:11 pmNew Scientist Brings Up Old Arguments
The above link is a response to Evolution: 24 Myths and Misconceptions published by New Scientist by Answers in Genesis, probably the most successful creationist site ever made.
From the beginning of the article, it rubs me the wrong way.
I know that this post is going to rub some people the wrong way and it might dissolve into an argument. I don't mean to single![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
mercuryblue144out, but there have been.... issues between us whenever we bring this up, so if you could kindly keep it as civil as possible, it would be much appreciated. If you want to get into a debate, please don't respond, or at least not on the public comment thread. If you wish to debate, then please send me a message via LJ, YIM, email, or in case of Clan, any other way you can think of.
Thank you.
The above link is a response to Evolution: 24 Myths and Misconceptions published by New Scientist by Answers in Genesis, probably the most successful creationist site ever made.
From the beginning of the article, it rubs me the wrong way.
I know that this post is going to rub some people the wrong way and it might dissolve into an argument. I don't mean to single
mercuryblue144out, but there have been.... issues between us whenever we bring this up, so if you could kindly keep it as civil as possible, it would be much appreciated. If you want to get into a debate, please don't respond, or at least not on the public comment thread. If you wish to debate, then please send me a message via LJ, YIM, email, or in case of Clan, any other way you can think of. Thank you.
